A Message from Our Founder: London’s Commitment Problem

Our founder, Sami Robertson, reflects on why London’s visible wealth doesn’t always translate into property purchases, and what that reveals about confidence in the capital.

London doesn’t have a wealth problem. It has a commitment problem.

Spend an evening at The Roof Gardens in Kensington and try telling me that wealthy people have abandoned the capital.

The place is heaving. I was recently told that around 6,500 people are waiting to join. Inside, people are spending heavily on good food, fine wine and entertaining. The money is clearly still here.

Yet last week, The Times published two apparently conflicting stories. One said international high rollers were leaving London clubland. The other said British buyers were returning to prime central London.

Those articles are not as contradictory as they appear.

International wealth has become increasingly cautious about tying itself to the UK. British wealth, meanwhile, is moving back into a prime London property market where values have fallen substantially from their peak.

But that isn’t necessarily a triumphant return of confidence. It is capital recognising value once enough risk has been removed from the price.

The private clubs reveal something else. Wealthy people are still perfectly happy to spend thousands on memberships, dinners, wine and experiences. Those purchases provide immediate enjoyment without creating a long-term financial or tax commitment.

Property is different.

Buying a home anchors capital. It creates exposure. It signals confidence not simply in London today, but in what London might become over the next ten or twenty years.

Ahead of the Budget, the Government may look at packed dining rooms and conclude that wealthy people can simply absorb more tax. That would be a mistake.

Visible spending should not be confused with permanent commitment. Money can dine in London tonight and be in Milan or Dubai tomorrow.

London remains magnetic. But magnetism alone doesn’t guarantee ownership.

Put simply – the money hasn’t left London. It simply wants a discount before it commits.

Click here to see the original post.